I have
been a personal friend and political supporter of Joseph Sestak since January
2006 when he first visited with me to discuss his running for Congress. I was
impressed that day and have become more impressed over the years with his integrity,
and his commitment to and caring for others.
And so of course I supported him for Congress twice and for the US
Senate twice. I believe he would be our
US Senator today if a few pols in PA hadn’t stood by allowing the ghost
conservative Toomey to win because of personal pique at Sestak’s willingness to
take on their long time friend Specter.
This
year the entire state party establishment (by that I mean the leaders not the
activists and committee persons) decided to stop his so far successful effort
to wage a six year campaign for a Senate seat.
They engineered a candidacy and they appealed to those in DC with access
to party funds to assist at the last minute in sabotaging Joe’s reputation with
scurrilous ads.
The
party establishment was successful in winning that primary and we know how much
they care about November from their inactivity six years ago. Incumbent Senator Toomey the conservative
enabler, who ideologically believes the kind of things that Trump speaks about,
is now poised keep his seat.
The
political pundits and the media all focus on -- will Bernie’s supporters vote
for Hillary? The question in PA is will
Joe Sestak’s supporters vote for the Democratic candidate for Senator in
November.
If
those of us who supported Joe allow our personal annoyance, in fact disgust, at
the actions of the self proclaimed political giants, to prevent us from voting
Democratic for US Senate in the general election then we are allowing the
Senate seat to be decided by our personal pique.
I do
not believe the Democratic candidate for Senator was the best of the three
presented in the primary. But to allow
the incumbent Toomey to be re-elected - NO. Let us be clear in our thinking. If Clinton is President and the Senate
remains Republican we face four more years of non-functioning government in
DC. And, if Trump is President and the
Senate is Republican we face a body of enablers who will ratify his appointees
to the Supreme Court and accept his nostalgic desire to return America to the
age of the Roaring Twenties.
Whatever
we may think about the personalities or campaign style of either of the candidates
let no one forget that Toomey opposes 99% of what Democrats in DC and
Harrisburg offer as solutions to our nation's problems. If one is in support of the Democratic
administration and its current efforts than one cannot allow Toomey to in
another term.
We
cannot allow Mitch McConnell and the Republicans to remain in control of the
Senate. We cannot allow them to block needed gun control reforms, we cannot
allow them to continue to block decent SCOTUS appointees, and we cannot allow
them to ignore immigration and voting rights problems. And the replacement of Toomey with a Democrat
to work with Senator Casey will be a step in the direction of restoring sanity
to the Senate.
We
will not have the opportunity to send Admiral Sestak to the United States
Senate but we can retire the man he campaigned so valiantly against these past
six years.
I
wanted to vote one more time for my friend Joe. I wanted to be there with him
the night he won his Senate seat. That will not happen. But I cannot be true to all Joe has fought
for and stood for in the Congress and in his campaigns if I pass on this
contest and allow Toomey to get another term.
The United States Senate is the second office on the November ballot
just after the joint vote for President/Vice President. I would urge all those who supported Joe to
join me in pressing the Democratic button for Senator.
30
June 2016
Pretty much: you are wrong in your assessment. Katie McGinty is worthless. She will do nothing useful in the Senate. We are probably even better off to have Toomey who at least knows the definition of bipartisan. McGinty only knows definitions that Schumer let's her know.
ReplyDeleteYou've also misunderstood the level of those who ousted Sestak. It wasn't state people. It was Schumer, Reid, Obama, and Biden. EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRATIC SENATOR EXCEPT ELIZABETH WARREN contributed to McGinty's campaign. Every single Democratic senator, except Elizabeth Warren, is part of the problem.
Better to take a stand against this Democratic "leadership" even if it means another 6 years of Toomey than to condone this behavior.
This behavior is why we have no real Democratic leadership. Where are the Ted Kennedys? They are no where because small men with only fears based leadership skills are using money raised to defeat Republicans to beat down our real leaders.
Chuck Schumer made his choice. He'd rather have 6 more years of Toomey than have a REAL Democratic leader in the Senate.
Our only hope for real leadership is to take a stand against Schumer. It's not even a hard choice. McGinty is an embarrassment of a candidate. Let Schumer suffer the consequences of his arrogance. Get him out of there by making it clear how horrible of a thing he did here.
Only then will we have a chance at real Democratic leadership.
Your lack of understanding, Maria, is stunning. Having worked for Joe Sestak and knowing him fairly well, I think, although I would not be obnoxious enough to say I "know his mind", he would agree with Cliff. The big picture is important and what is ultimately at stack, This is not about Katie McGinty who was and is being played by the local and State establishments. Nationally--following the game plan. Another 6 years of Toomey would be a disaster on all levels. I am no longer in PA, but my many friends are and yes, we know how to "hold our noses" and do what is necessary. Keep your eye on the prize.
ReplyDelete